Tyler Fridrich
My feedback
3 results found
-
43 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
-
56 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Tyler Fridrich supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment -
133 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Tyler Fridrich supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Tyler Fridrich commentedPre-populating from CRM also solves the issue of tagging preferred names which are often different than legal names. How do other Imaging users deal with this?
Because search for tags doesn’t appear to accept partial strings, a client named Joseph, would never be found by performing a search for Joe.
Multiple values for index fields are also necessary. If a document applies to Joe and Jane, both names should be tagged without having to have multiple instances of that document stored on Imaging.
I agree. Not only for CRM document storage, but previews for RT Imaging files as well.