Skip to content

Tyler Fridrich

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 56 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tyler Fridrich supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tyler Fridrich commented  · 

    I agree. Not only for CRM document storage, but previews for RT Imaging files as well.

  3. 133 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tyler Fridrich supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tyler Fridrich commented  · 

    Pre-populating from CRM also solves the issue of tagging preferred names which are often different than legal names. How do other Imaging users deal with this?

    Because search for tags doesn’t appear to accept partial strings, a client named Joseph, would never be found by performing a search for Joe.

    Multiple values for index fields are also necessary. If a document applies to Joe and Jane, both names should be tagged without having to have multiple instances of that document stored on Imaging.

Feedback and Knowledge Base