Skip to content

GLH

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 376 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GLH commented  · 

    Many of our workflows include a step where support staff is checking in on something, e.g. prospect has scheduled a fit meeting, outside practitioners have implemented an estate plan or insurance. if the staff member checks in once, the client has not completed the task, then they need to adjust the due date of the step. That's fine, as they may decide to adjust the next due date out a month or more, depending on the circumstances. BUT, the issue is that none of the future steps/tasks adjust their future due dates. This means, that they need to go in and manually adjust the due date of every future step, every time we are updating workflows. this is very laborious and manual - which leaves room for human error. it would be better if the workflow would adjust all future due dates by the "new" adjusted date of the current step, i.e. the next step is supposed to happen in 4 weeks, and the next step in 6 weeks - and the actual due dates would automatically adjust for all future steps/tasks.

    GLH supported this idea  · 
  2. 599 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    GLH supported this idea  · 
  3. 782 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    GLH supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base