Heidi Bringhurst
My feedback
24 results found
-
157 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Heidi Bringhurst
supported this idea
·
-
500 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Heidi Bringhurst
supported this idea
·
-
536 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Heidi Bringhurst
supported this idea
·
-
1,251 votes
Redtail’s Product Owner has read the suggestion and there is some internal discussion needed in order to determine next steps.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Heidi Bringhurst
supported this idea
·
Wholeheartedly agree. Had Workflows set up to just run back through themselves every appropriate period, in Leapfrog, because you could set a time frame between steps, instead of due dates based on an overall target date. When the last step was completed, it just went back to the first step with a due date a certain amount of time out (for instance, a month after completion of the last step). Once we switched to Tailwag, and they started using target dates and took away the option to use a certain time frame based following completion of a previous step, it made a LOT of our Workflows practically useless. We have to go in to each one now and manually assign a due date to the Tasks under each Step. Cumbersome!