Tom M.
My feedback
28 results found
-
1,985 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
-
189 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Tom M.
supported this idea
·
-
886 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
supported this idea
·
-
251 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added. This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
commented
This was aggravating when we switched to Redtail last year and had 1,600 accounts imported. While it did take me quite some time, I ended up writing a "script" of sorts in Excel to help with this, although it really only helped with qualified accounts.
I exported data from DST Vision, AssetMark, and a few annuity companies. Using the "vlookup" function in Excel, I was able to look up an account number in one spreadsheet, find the type of qualified account, and put that into another spreadsheet that would then be imported back into Redtail.
This took a lot of time but much less than updating 1,600 accounts manually.
It does bug me that the Registration/type of account is in a completely separate section of Account information in Redtail than the Qualified Type field, but it is what it is. I doubt they would totally revamp that since it could drastically affect existing databases.
Please also add Beneficiary Roth IRA to the list of Qualified account types! This is important!
Tom M.
supported this idea
·
-
503 votes
Redtail’s Product Owner has read the suggestion and there is some internal discussion needed in order to determine next steps.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
commented
+1 for per stirpes and per capita! Great suggestion, Leo.
Tom M.
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
Redtail’s Product Owner has read the suggestion and there is some internal discussion needed in order to determine next steps.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
commented
I agree that the tiny circle/square is somewhat useless. I use this mainly for our business clients to add their logo. I don't see the usefulness of using it for clients to add photos since it is so small. There is a lot of real estate on that contact screen header, and a larger client photo/headshot/logo would be useful.
-
74 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
commented
I would also like additional automation triggers. We do a lot of group benefits (401k, group medical, ancillary benefits), and are starting to add workflows for specific employer clients so the proper steps are taken for their specific group. I wanted to set one up to trigger when a new contact has a specific employer. I might start using Source for this instead, and use that as the trigger.
-
438 votes
The suggestion may be planned, but there is no timeline on this feature being added.
This suggestion is remaining open and can continue to gather votes and comments!
Tom M.
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom M.
commented
+1 for creating a QuickList from a UDF.
This would be incredibly helpful, and I'm surprised that this hasn't been reviewed by Redtail yet.